Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 449
61% 452 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 3.84
4% 4.61 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.35
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Skihotar A320 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 397 410 70 41 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 440
Write 410
Mixed 377
SusWrite 224
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 30.4
138% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 51.2
94% 181 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
368GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 126 130 130 128 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-2666Mhz-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback