Today's hottest deals

Asus P5G41T-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120608
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 02 '15 at 16:27
Run Duration717 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6600-$50
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 82.2
29% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 80.8
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Asus(1043 836D) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.62 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 157
Write 219
Mixed 184
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 9.82
61% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 10.1
14% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 111%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
580GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 84
Write 90.8
Mixed 82
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.23
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
556GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 63.7
Write 76.5
Mixed 70.1
53% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 68.9
Write 47.9
Mixed 55
70% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.25
4K Mixed 0.04
10% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 44%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
854GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 69.9
Write 71.3
Mixed 68.9
91% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
608GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 102
Write 98.1
Mixed 101
130% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.42
84% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
529GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 17.3
Mixed 16.6
26% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.38
42% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
310GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 83.9
Write 77
Mixed 73.4
99% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.28
4K Mixed 0.07
12% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 48%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
46GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 46.3
Write 12.3
Mixed 17.4
26% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.91
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.29
54% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 55%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 64GB
13GB free, PID 16a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 67
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.9
43% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.87
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.26
50% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 53%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Read 9.87
Write 3.16
Mixed 4.98
6% 6 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.44
37% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 12%
Typical P5G41T-M LX Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback