Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 384
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
HP(103C 90B7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 2
2% 2.11 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 57 72 84 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 99.2
Mixed 65
SusWrite 75.3
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 9.7 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 2.8
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 10.8
12% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 017A 78.B1GE3.AUZ0C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback