Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 62 2-Core 110 53% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 169 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CE) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.39 3% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 43 52 45 34 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 314 Write 82.8 Mixed 127 SusWrite 41.2 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 17 65% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 98.4 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 41.9 40% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 53%
Intenso Speed Line 64GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 43GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 1.6 15 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	8.76% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 20 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 13.1 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 26% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 M471B5673DZ1-CF8 4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16