QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.4 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 00:55
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 195
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 423
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 100
88% 107 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 90.2
77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 644GB
80GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 382 417 422 424 422 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.3% Excellent
Read 330
Write 392
Mixed 320
SusWrite 405
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 32.8
119% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 212
184% 276 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Qemu HARDDISK 81GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 149 139 132 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 35.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 25.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback