Asrock H310CM-DVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-DVS  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 202
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 286
37% 281 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 36.9
29% 34.1 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 32.8
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 55 64 54 47 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 330
Write 277
Mixed 86
SusWrite 83.2
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 17.7
82% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 25.3
50% 100 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLJG42F-D8KFFG------ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-DVS Builds (Compare 2,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-DVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback