Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 14:31
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 402
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 368D) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.5
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 13.2
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 425
Mixed 347
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 47.6
166% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 225
205% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 442 440 436 440 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 417
Mixed 384
SusWrite 441
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 50.7
164% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 259
219% 321 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 112%
Great: 117%
Plugable USB3-SATA-U3 1TB
523GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 34.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 38
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 19.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback