Asrock Z68M-ITX/HT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z68M-ITX/HT  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 08:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 350
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.41
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 461
Mixed 300
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 39.4
129% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 174
183% 302 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
67GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 75.5
Write 44.6
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 64.3
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 59%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
264GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 24.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 19.3
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 19%
TrekStor DS maxi classic 1TB
42GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 17.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 19.2
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68M-ITX/HT Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z68M-ITX/HT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback