Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 255545U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 255545U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory15.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '17 at 16:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 306
47% 340 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 0.97
2% 2.16 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.78
2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 164
Mixed 157
125% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 114%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
142GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.8
Mixed 37.7
49% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255545U Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 255545U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback