HP 700-010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-010  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 119
51% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 187
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
MSI(1462 3011) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 14.5
9% 12 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 10.1
8% 9.72 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 116 102 118 125 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 173
Write 173
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 115
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3300820AS 300GB
183GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71
Write 38.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 68.6
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-010 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback