Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '20 at 11:48
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$192 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 88 2-Core 169 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 447 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 66.6 56% 67.7 fps	MRender 72.7 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 55.2 51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 478 Write 434 Mixed 373 95% 428 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 40.9 136% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 358 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 415GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 142 148 146 148 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 154 Write 149 Mixed 107 SusWrite 148 103% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 417GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 81.6 115% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	69x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16