HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory3.9 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 01:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 62.1
39% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 65
8-Core 62
9% 63.5 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.41
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 179 75 64 41 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 205
Write 178
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 92.7
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.9
27% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 2.9
6% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5474-026.A00LF ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 39GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback