Colorful C.H61U PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardColorful C.H61U PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 05:43
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3210-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 129
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 199
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2307) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 27.2
22% 26.1 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 27.6
20% 24 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 212 89 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 227
Write 204
Mixed 181
SusWrite 120
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 27.1
98% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.7
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 36.3
32% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 91%
External USB3.0 500GB
41GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 25 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 26.1
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung JH3X1600W4G11-BF JH3X1866W4G11-B 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C.H61U PRO Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Colorful C.H61U PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback