Lenovo 3548CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3548CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120504
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 162
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 353
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3091) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.65 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 211 209 207 208 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 184
Write 211
Mixed 143
SusWrite 208
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 21.1
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 28.5
24% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6K1 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback