Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
62% 117 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 303
44% 324 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 52GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 457
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 2.6
24% 117 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 56%
Red Hat VirtIO 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 7.4 5.4 6 6.7 8.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 414
Write 20.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 7.2
24% 116 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
16% 3.7 MB/s
Qemu HARDDISK 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5 5.2 6.7 7.6 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10% Very poor
Read 155
Write 7.5
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 6
10% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
13% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Qemu HARDDISK 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.3 5.9 6.2 5.3 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 31.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback