Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 130 2-Core 242 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 772 71% 594 Pts	64-Core 962 60% 962 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Legend(17AA 2297) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 443.17 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.5% Average	Lighting 48 Reflection 55.4 Parallax 45 39% 49.5 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 48 Splatting 62.6 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB 9,415 User benchmarks, average bench 289% 535GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4M2QEXF7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1332 1356 1329 1315 1326 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,179 Write 1,859 Mixed 1,702 SusWrite 1347 397% 1,772 MB/s	4K Read 54.5 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 70.7 238% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 938 DQ Write 748 DQ Mixed 868 643% 851 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 380%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 405GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2078 2102 1128 1066 1053 1058 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,363 Write 2,129 Mixed 1,601 SusWrite 1,414 421% 1,877 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 72.4 249% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,029 DQ Write 889 DQ Mixed 962 720% 960 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$97 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2056 2127 1515 1510 1493 1503 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	317% Outstanding	Read 2,326 Write 2,147 Mixed 1,831 SusWrite 1,701 450% 2,001 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 76.5 249% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 870 DQ Mixed 954 712% 947 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 317% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 95GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.2% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 25.6 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 73%

Battleship

CPU
Xeon E-2276MIntelBench 82%, 1,872 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	18x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	10x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	2x
970 EVO Plus 1TBSamsungBench 322%, 851 samples	2x

RAM
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 438 samples	12x
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 64GBHynixBench 84%, 10 samples	3x
4x31.8GBUnknownBench 105%, 601 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16