Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 20:40
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 93.6
45% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 103
13% 98.6 Pts
64-Core 98.1
6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
MSI(1462 2503) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.19
4% 4.88 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 4.87
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 222 250 271 182 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 248
Write 315
Mixed 241
SusWrite 222
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 14.1
57% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 40
32% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
315GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 114 118 111 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 111
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
787GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 129 130 119 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 79
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
598GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 89 90 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50% Average
Read 86.9
Write 85.7
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 86.9
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 100%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 119 120 107 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 73.7
Write 57.2
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 114
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
861GB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18
17% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 110%
USB 3TB
560GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 33.6
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 17.9
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Hynix HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Hynix HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback