Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 212
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 725
77% 613 Pts
64-Core 719
44% 719 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 76.1
79% 85.9 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 78
63% 76.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 24 11 22 20 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 412
Write 342
Mixed 235
SusWrite 56.2
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 12
52% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 43.4
48% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
75GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 605 607 610 608 610 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 600
Mixed 595
SusWrite 610
139% 616 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73.7
241% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 1,132
751% 894 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 173%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
152GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 122 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 143
Mixed 100
SusWrite 122
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 8502 2400 C15 Series 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 8502 2400 C15 Series 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $274
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback