HP ZBook 17 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 860C
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 259
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 921
87% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 860C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 97
Parallax 8.31
6% 37.4 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 16
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
HP(103C 860C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 443.18
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72% Very good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 85.4
72% 90.8 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 77
Splatting 76.7
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H1 1TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 998 1044 1076 1026 758 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 1,399
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 1007
292% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 75.3
245% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 934
699% 934 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 250%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 G6 Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback