Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 55.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 74% 142 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 452 64% 474 Pts	64-Core 364 23% 364 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 92.7 Parallax 85.5 85% 94.3 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 82.1 Splatting 75.2 70% 87 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 78 83 77 77 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 361 Write 352 Mixed 141 SusWrite 96.1 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 73.9 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 17.2 50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 462GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 137 138 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 137 Write 143 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 136 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	133x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	113x
Core i5-8400Intel $128Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	109x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	66x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	23x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16