Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 06:50
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 772
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 105
81% 105 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 96.3
77% 94 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,961
Write 4,762
Mixed 5,883
1,373% 6,202 MB/s
4K Read 476
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 326
1,281% 357 MB/s
DQ Read 1,230
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 952
741% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
240GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 108 117 117 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 61.3
Write 107
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 106
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA42UG-MEC1U2AW1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 31.3
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 29
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback