Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469 4,317 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 86 2-Core 182 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 424 48% 377 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 6,267 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Clevo(1558 5102) 1.5GB CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	8.25% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 7.56 8% 9.33 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 9.8 Splatting 12.7 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.25% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 379 382 369 375 358 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 355 Write 382 Mixed 302 SusWrite 372 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 28.4 118% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 328 249% 335 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO2GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 029E CMSO2GX3M1A1333C9 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	3x
GTX 675MNvidiaBench 12%, 994 samples	1x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $68Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	2x
M4 64GBCrucial $92Bench 55%, 7,336 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 029E CMSO2GX3M1A1333C9 4GBHynixBench 41%, 5 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 470 samples	1x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GBHynixBench 27%, 26 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $268

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16