ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z97 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock Z97 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '15 at 08:30
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 97.1 2-Core 190 65% 144 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 374 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1187) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.4 28% 33.8 fps	MRender 43 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 33.3 29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 173 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 218 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2584 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 180390264868 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1398436471 (F7) Unknown 100 100 43781501 (F8) Unknown 100 100 21092046	87.6% Excellent	Read 512 Write 389 Mixed 304 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 21.9 109% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 43.2 88% 178 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 92GB free Firmware: 20.01H20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 138 4066 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 186 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 106 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 131 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 439 (C2) HDA temperature 113 100 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 11 (F1) Unknown 200 200 1163218476 (F2) Unknown 200 200 291560127	44.5% Average	Read 76.9 Write 78.1 Mixed 15.7 41% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.38 91% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 69%
ADATA NH01 750GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 558GB free, PID a01a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 87 Write 75.3 Mixed 38.4 80% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 32%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 18GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 42.5 Write 8.08 Mixed 10.4 19% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.49 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.7 58% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z97 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme4 - $129

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	483x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	290x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	158x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	79x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	56x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	38x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	37x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	39x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $777

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback