HP 23-q112

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-q112  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B42
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 23:17
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 75
30% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 112
18% 126 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 2B42) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 3.69
2% 3.36 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 242 89 66 69 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 416
Write 326
Mixed 236
SusWrite 137
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 21.9
72% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 157
124% 172 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.8
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-q112 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-q112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback