Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30CYS13500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30CYS13500  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 314F
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2226G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 859
90% 719 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 26.7
27% 27.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 32.3
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm981 NVMe Samsung 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD71D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 356 303 301 305 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 1,173
Mixed 875
SusWrite 441
237% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 77.8
266% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,357
DQ Mixed 957
782% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 233%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5180ME78HBF-2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback