Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20CJS14S03

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 23% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20CJS14S03  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20CJS14S03
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime71 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%
CPU Throttled 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 54
28% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 82.8
8-Core 82.2
11% 82.5 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2223) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.57
2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-256V2S 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3C87902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 211 242 230 266 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 448
Write 274
Mixed 275
SusWrite 236
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 23
71% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 161
126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20CJS14S03 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20CJS14S03

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback