EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1000 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 10:15
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 168
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 632
57% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 311.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 14
11% 15.5 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 17.3
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 52 60 62 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 68.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 55.6
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
131% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
333GB free
Firmware: 07.02E07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 64.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 64.3
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965447-035.A00LF 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback