Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Powerleaader PR1715RC2_21

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Powerleaader PR1715RC2_21 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory	60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 06:17
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 884 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 153 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 553 51% 425 Pts	64-Core 1,442 89% 1,442 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.06 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 99 122 60 57 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 387 Write 275 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 91.7 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 10.1 40% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 16.2 14% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 56%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 13TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 203 204 212 212 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 202 Write 208 Mixed 148 SusWrite 208 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 1 18% 6 MB/s	DQ Read 6.2 DQ Write 4.3 DQ Mixed 6.8 5% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 26%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$185 369 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 123GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 144 140 145 145 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 120%
WD WD140EDFZ-11A0VA 14TB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 206 207 202 205 206 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 3TB free Firmware: 0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 149 146 150 148 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 177 180 182 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 177 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 179 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 177 177 180 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 161 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 178 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-YK0 8x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.2% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 31 104% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback