Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6128 29 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 49.1 1-Core 8.8 2-Core 10.8 20% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 21.3 8-Core 27.3 3% 24.3 Pts	64-Core 7.7 0% 7.7 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 24 Parallax 30.4 18% 25.6 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 25.5 24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 99 105 109 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.7% Very poor	Read 97.3 Write 116 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 96.4 22% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 6.5 24% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 42.7 DQ Mixed 23.9 20% 29.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 475GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 31 35 41 31 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 38.1 Write 53.6 Mixed 16 SusWrite 32.6 26% 35.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 Ma... 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.27 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $175Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16