Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 13:13
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 94
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 464
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
HP(103C 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 420 59 7.4 6.7 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 486
Write 425
Mixed 396
SusWrite 154
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 23.6
107% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 41.1
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 92%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
136GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 25
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLGG45F-D8KMB 8325 FLGG45F-D8KMB 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback