PC Vanquish Renegade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC Vanquish Renegade  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A
Memory9.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 02:47
Run Duration990 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 887
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 136
Parallax 126
102% 129 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 112
Splatting 104
85% 104 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB
497GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 375 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 453
Write 377
Mixed 379
SusWrite 113
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 26.5
111% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 45.8
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.7 187 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 197
Write 158
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 64
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
41GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 18 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 22.2
Mixed 18
SusWrite 10.1
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
134% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 33%
SDXC Card 197GB
183GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 17 20 17 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 28
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 12.2
34% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.2
282% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 32%
External USB3.0 DISK00 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 101 100 114 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 129
Write 107
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 71.7
120% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.07 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 112 116 128 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 137
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 80
121% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 101 99 0 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
Read 121
Write 140
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 33.3
105% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.7
248% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
Read 167
Write 129
Mixed 84
SusWrite 0.1
113% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.8 144 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 145
Write 117
Mixed 71
SusWrite 49.7
119% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 37%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 92 80 68 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 112
SusWrite 59.4
150% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 51 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 59.2
Write 62.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 28.7
69% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
393GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 86 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 88.5
Write 77.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 43.6
73% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK01 500GB
149GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0.2 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 104
Write 41.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 2.4
56% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK00 750GB
399GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 86 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 84.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 29.8
62% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 35%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 4GB
1GB free, PID c75a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 5 4.9 6 6.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 4
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 3.7
9% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vanquish Renegade Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: PC Vanquish Renegade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback