Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 54.1 2-Core 94.6 44% 70.3 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 156 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 1.62 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,387 Write 1,240 Mixed 1,792 399% 1,806 MB/s	4K Read 85.5 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 46.2 211% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 354 251% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 32GB 453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 28GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 16 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 11.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 15.2 12% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.9 568% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-082.A00LF 2x8GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.1 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM