Huananzhi X58

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X58 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '20 at 19:56
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 148 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 500 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.5% Average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 63.4 39% 57.1 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 51.3 44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 191 211 228 225 224 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.8% Above average	Read 229 Write 220 Mixed 208 SusWrite 216 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 20.9 78% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 38.4 60% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 32 30 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 107 Write 32.1 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 30.4 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.5% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	20x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	16x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MZ7KM240HMHQ0D3 240GBBench 98%, 30 samples	7x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	5x

RAM
1x33GB^Y[fXfPV(@XZBench 31%, 36 samples	12x
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 37GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	7x
HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GBHynixBench 49%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16