Today's hottest deals

Asus AM1M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 01:18
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 2650 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 8.6
2-Core 44.1
26% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 39.9
8-Core 43.8
6% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 43.4
3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.91
1% 2.25 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G B 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 96 199 94 14 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 184
Write 292
Mixed 132
SusWrite 70.8
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 6
39% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 14.7
37% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
466GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 100 116 109 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 8.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 8
SusWrite 101
37% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0 1.8 0 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1
3% 2.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M-A/BR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback