Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 103 52% 81.1 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 174 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250 5,806 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 1706) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.41 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 420 Write 125 Mixed 217 55% 254 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 12.6 60% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 31.6 48% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.M16F CT51264BA1339.C16F 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 13.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.4 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	3x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-441.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 108 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 9,885 samples	2x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16