Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 212
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 442
59% 443 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 52.5
34% 44.7 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 36.7
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.3 340 109 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 908
Mixed 869
SusWrite 98.1
179% 809 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.5
231% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 221
272% 462 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 158%
Great: 209%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
532GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 443 382 369 371 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 467
Mixed 383
SusWrite 400
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 38.5
138% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 343
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 105%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 140 141 137 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 140
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
49% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 2
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
312GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 157
Write 67.5
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 62.8
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 28
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback