Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 214
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 506
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.1
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 18
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P300 1TB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S06148B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 223 698 383 557 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,343
Write 135
Mixed 708
SusWrite 478
146% 666 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 30.9
156% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 392
296% 401 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 147%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 04CD F4-2666C19-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 24.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback