Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10FD002CUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FD002CUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170216
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 18:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 619
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7156
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 3.72
5% 5.37 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 11.3
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0DL022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 273 260 232 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 402
Write 312
Mixed 317
SusWrite 226
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 28.7
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 277
199% 255 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 94%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
335GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 99 100 111 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 107
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-027.A00G Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FD002CUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FD002CUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback