Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1234

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '17 at 21:50
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 79.3
41% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 145
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 04A7) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.15 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 3G SSD 60GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 247
Write 52
Mixed 79.6
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 9.59
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 5.78
42% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 6.36
13% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
144GB free
Firmware: 3.AHH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 58.4
Mixed 56.6
43% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.33
82% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1234 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback