HP 810-209

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 810-209 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '20 at 17:18
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 518 59% 459 Pts	64-Core 623 39% 623 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 441.06 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 28.8 19% 25.8 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 27.4 Splatting 23 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM10H6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 450 Write 160 Mixed 194 58% 268 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 36 135% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 111 116% 198 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 843GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 169 171 171 171 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 149 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 167 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 4,801 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 26 26 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 24.1 17% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 12GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-209 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP 810-209

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	5x
MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GBSamsungBench 81%, 1,744 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 43%, 122 samples	3x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 95 samples	3x
HP698651-154-KEF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GBKingstonBench 39%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16