HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	79%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 616 59% 488 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 90.4 Reflection 87.3 Parallax 92.2 74% 90 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 83.9 Splatting 65.8 70% 88.3 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 188 215 100 110 127 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 759 Write 268 Mixed 256 SusWrite 147 78% 358 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 45.4 135% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 648 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 132 162% 300 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 147%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 63 71 133 123 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 46 Write 157 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 108 61% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 1x8GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,377x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,006x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	710x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	711x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,397x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,226x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	292x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,895x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	778x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	452x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16