Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 4752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4752  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4752
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 10:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 86.4
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 140
61% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 61.1
8-Core 338
20% 200 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0506) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 0.84
2% 1.92 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 167 73 84 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 447
Write 366
Mixed 332
SusWrite 139
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 33
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 174
155% 232 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YKO 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4752 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback