HP 750-114

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 750-114  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 396
51% 387 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 77.3
50% 67.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 52.7
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 136 128 135 119 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 238
Write 220
Mixed 218
SusWrite 129
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 38.3
138% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 135
110% 153 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 85%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60% Good
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 108
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-114 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback