Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEmaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 06:28
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 71
2-Core 108
47% 78 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 109
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.03
8% 9.58 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 9.87
Splatting 10.8
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 106 74 68 86 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 471
Write 239
Mixed 202
SusWrite 80.8
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 33.7
94% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 116
79% 99 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
405GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 118 111 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB
261GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 83.9
Write 85.8
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 71.7
97% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 99U5584-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A70FM2+iCafe Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback