MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Memory 32.3 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 33.6 18% 27.6 Pts	4-Core 67.8 8-Core 134 12% 101 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.5% Below average	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 41.5 Parallax 62.2 27% 45.5 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 66.8 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 178 189 210 425 447 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 821 Write 984 Mixed 512 SusWrite 275 145% 648 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 15.9 53% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 148 103% 129 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 464%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 117GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 104 105 106 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 123 Write 121 Mixed 90 SusWrite 104 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.5 169% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 47.9 116% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.1 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 242 17% 242 ns
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 189%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,611

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16