Lenovo 80NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80NA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Yoga 500-14ACL
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150807
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 15 '17 at 22:26
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 72.8
36% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 114
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.87
2% 3.93 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 3.57
2% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLN256HCHP-000L2 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT63L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 498
Write 199
Mixed 286
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 16.5
84% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 16.3
20% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 104%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
927GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 106
143% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.25
83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-063.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80NA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback