Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 15:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 230
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 583
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 3757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 87.3
Parallax 116
89% 104 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 113
Splatting 89.7
96% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 170 187 206 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.8% Above average
Read 201
Write 38.7
Mixed 115
SusWrite 175
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 28
107% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 47.1
43% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 93%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
166GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 138 185 214 214 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 318
Write 269
Mixed 209
SusWrite 197
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 16.8
41% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 26.5
20% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.3
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 40.4
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 1.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $816
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback