Twinhead SA14iT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemTwinhead SA14iT  (all builds)
Motherboard TWINHEAD
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 17:30
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 231
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(14FF A032) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAT128MBF 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 342 196 157 157 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 224
Write 297
Mixed 227
SusWrite 226
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 27.9
80% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 35.4
36% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60
272GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 101 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 92
Write 91.5
Mixed 69
SusWrite 104
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 65%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
10GB free, PID 0331
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 23 25 22 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 25
Write 8.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 23.7
18% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5417-030.A00G 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SA14iT Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Twinhead SA14iT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback