Medionpc MS-7713

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedionpc MS-7713  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7713
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 44
2-Core 87.9
44% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 164
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 153
9% 153 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
MSI(1462 2530) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 9.07
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.16
7% 8.43 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 9.22
7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 125 123 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 207
Write 126
Mixed 111
SusWrite 121
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 12.3
49% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 45.1
56% 99 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 71%
Kingston UHSII uSD Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 23 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 75.7
Write 33.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 24.8
57% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.6
241% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG 4GB
667, 200 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7713 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7713

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback