Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 742
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 82
80% 88.8 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 78.1
74% 92.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 133 113 129 106 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 443
Write 363
Mixed 296
SusWrite 146
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 16.5
74% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 18.8
39% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
833GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 171 173 174 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 93
SusWrite 172
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer 126GB
32GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.9 7.7 5.8 6.3 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 16.7
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 7.6
20% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback